legendkiller003 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:41 pm Should be good now

You the man lk!

It still shows Harper/Rowan and Charlotte with wins/a tie in the post trade section, but I don't think that matters. As long as the points are correct

I don’t think so either, but if Mack or Chise think it should be changed just to be totally correct then I can do so.

GM Bike wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2017 6:10 pm It still shows Harper/Rowan and Charlotte with wins/a tie in the post trade section, but I don't think that matters. As long as the points are correct

Thanks; I just zeroed out the post win/loss/ties for everyone. That part looks fine to me now I think.

@legendkiller003 Are we missing pre-ties/wins/losses for anyone now? If so those should be re-added just with 0pts being scored for them since the points look fine.

Actually let me just set the pre equal to the totals and it should be fine I think. One sec...

EDIT: Done. Looks fine to me. It probably woulda corrected itself next time the standings were updated but I went ahead and fixed the stable win/loss/ties totals as well. All looks well.

Looks good. Tho I still don't know the point of W-L if it's not used as a tiebreaker lol.

There was one season my entire stable was undefeated and I was still 40pts behind. W/L means nothing when there's no penalty for losing. You just want people who are active.

I kinda wish there was a promo bonus for people who appear, but don't wrestle, but then you get into that gray area of do we count all promos, in-ring, backstage, taped vignettes etc. but it would be nice for people who are on the show, but don't wrestle. It would give lesser valued people a little more value, even if it's just a point.

legendkiller003 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2017 6:49 pm Looks good. Tho I still don't know the point of W-L if it's not used as a tiebreaker lol.

Lol. I use it only when evaluating for trades in terms of how active people are, whether they win a lot, etc. Or even when making the picks before a season starts.

@Smurf interesting thought. It could work under the show appearance for 1 pt. That would also lend a point to all the throw away people every week like Renee Young, ring announcers, Daniel Bryan, Steph, etc.

legendkiller003 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:41 pm @Smurf interesting thought. It could work under the show appearance for 1 pt. That would also lend a point to all the throw away people every week like Renee Young, ring announcers, Daniel Bryan, Steph, etc.

That's what I was thinking too. Plus, when people get someone like Emmalina and she never fucking debuts, at least you get a point for all those teasers.

I wouldn't consider a vignette counting for an appearance. They'd have to physically appear during the show. I should add that I don't think it's something we need to add, but I find it interesting nonetheless.

Yeah, true and me either, but I'm always thinking of new ways to add things, even if it never gets added.

Part of the reason WWE's version didn't work was they scored everything. It was a mess. Like you could get 10,000pts or something crazy in one week. I forget what the rules were exactly, but the template for it pretty much copied SW.

There was one week where I was right at the top of the standings, but it didn't last long lol.

I got all excited when I saw Gran Metalik won on Main Event, but then realized I picked Lince Dorado. FML

The trade window is now open: http://www.stablewars.com/sw/wwe_trade.php

I think you guys forgot to add Balor's points on RAW (the match was scored but Balor's score wasn't added on the summary section)